Table 4.

Pearson correlation coefficients between Meal-Q, MiniMeal-Q, and the WFR (n=163) and DLW (n=39).

Energy and macronutrients	Crudea		Energy-adjusteda,b		Deattenuated (95% CI)c
	Meal-Q	MiniMeal-Q	Meal-Q	MiniMeal-Q	Meal-Q	MiniMeal-Q
Energy	0.16	0.16	—	—	0.18 (0.01-0.36)	0.18 (0.01-0.33)
Protein	0.22	0.21	0.30	0.31	0.33 (0.17-0.47)	0.34 (0.18-0.48)
Carbohydrates	0.54	0.54	0.62	0.57	0.65 (0.54-0.74)	0.60 (0.48-0.70)
Total fat	0.06	0.02	0.55	0.49	0.57 (0.45-0.67)	0.51 (0.37-0.62)
Saturated fat	0.15	0.11	0.57	0.54	0.60 (0.48-0.70)	0.57 (0.44-0.67)
Monounsaturated fat	0.13	0.08	0.52	0.46	0.56 (0.43-0.67)	0.50 (0.36-0.62)
Polyunsaturated fat	0.23	0.21	0.36	0.35	0.42 (0.25-0.56)	0.40 (0.23-0.54)
Alcohol	0.64	0.65	0.61	0.63	0.73 (0.59-0.82)	0.74 (0.60-0.83)
DLW, energy (CI)d	0.42 (0.16-0.68)	0.38 (0.10-0.66)	—	—	—	—

^aAll correlation coefficients were statistically significant (P = <.001-.046), except for crude total, saturated and monounsaturated fat for both questionnaires (P=.06-.84).

^bAdjustments for energy were made using the residual method [18].

^cDeattenuated values were obtained using the formulas suggested by Beaton et al [20] and Liu et al [21]. Confidence intervals were produced using the method suggested by Willett and Rosner [22].

^dConfidence intervals were obtained using the bootstrap method [23].