Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Apr 20.
Published in final edited form as: Lancet. 2013 Feb 28;381(9875):1371–1379. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62129-1

Table 1.

Five disorder meta-analysis results for regions with p<5×10−8

Chromosome Base-pair
position*
Nearest gene Alleles Frequency Imputation quality
score (INFO)
p value OR (95% CI) Heterogeneity
p value
Best-fit model
(BIC)§
rs2535629 3 52808259 ITIH3 (+ many) G/A 0·651 0·942 2·54×10−12 1·10 (1·07–1·12) 0·27 Five disorder
rs11191454 10 104649994 AS3MT (+ many) A/G 0·910 1·01 1·39×10−8 1·13 (1·08–1·18) 0·32 Five disorder
rs1024582 12 2272507 CACNA1C A/G 0·337 0·98 1·87×10−8 1·07 (1·05–1·10) 0·0057 BPD, schizophrenia
rs2799573 10 18641934 CACNB2 T/C 0·715 0·825 4·29×10−8 1·08 (1·05–1·12) 0·57 Five disorder

Most strongly associated single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in associated region after clumping—ie, grouping SNPs within 250 kb of the index SNP that have r2>0·2 with the index SNP as implemented in PLINK. OR=odds ratio. BIC=Bayesian information criteria. BPD=bipolar disorder.

*

Detected with University of California Santa Cruz Genome Browser (version hg18).

Risk allele frequency in controls.

Estimated OR from multinomial logistic regression used in the modelling analysis.

§

Best-fit multinomial logistic model by BIC criteria; appendix pp 38–45 provide a comparison of BIC and Akaike information criteria across models.

Best-fit model supports an effect on all five disorders.