Skip to main content
. 2011 May 9;1(1):10.3402/jchimp.v1i1.7033. doi: 10.3402/jchimp.v1i1.7033

Table 3.

Comparison of student evaluations of LC1 and LC2

% agreed or strongly agreed

LC1 (124 respondents, 100% response) LC2 (114 respondents, 97.4% response)
I received clear learning objectives for the clerkship 36.3 71.9
My performance was assessed against the learning objectives 32.2 62.9
I had the opportunity to follow a variety of different patients 65.3 71.9
My attending faculty members were adequately involved in teaching 77.2 91.2
I received helpful feedback on my performance during this clerkship 66.9 73.6
Faculty consistently modeled professionalism during this clerkship 87.1 92.9
Residents and fellows provided effective teaching during the clerkship 81.8 74.2
My overall learning objectives for this clerkship were met 60.2 77.2
Overall, how would you rate this clerkship? 53.2 82.5

Note: LC1 included 124 students in a transitional one-semester class (August through December 2009), and LC2 included 119 students in its first complete two-semester class (January through December 2010).