. 2013 Jul 4;10(9):1113–1120. doi: 10.7150/ijms.6843

Table 2.

Summary of OR of the ADIPOQ polymorphisms and CRC risk.

SNP	Ethnicity	N.	Dominant model		Recessive model		Ht vs WT Ho		VR vs WT Ho
			OR(95% CI)	P^a	OR(95% CI)	P^a	OR(95% CI)	P^a	OR(95% CI)	P^a
rs1501299G/T	Total	8	0.94[0.83,1.05]	0.27	0.94[0.77,1.15]	0.26	0.94[0.83,1.06]	0.36	0.92[0.75,1.12]	0.25
	Asian	3	0.83[0.68,1.00]	0.38	0.78[0.57,1.06]	0.98	0.84[0.68,1.03]	0.78	0.72[0.52,0.99]	0.92
	Caucasian	4	1.01[0.86,1.18]	0.26	1.22[0.92,1.62]	0.78	0.97[0.82,1.15]	0.26	1.20[0.89,1.61]	0.66
	African-American	1	1.05[0.72,1.53]	-	0.63[0.36,1.13]	-	1.17[0.79,1.74]	-	0.69[0.37,1.27]	-
rs2241766T/G	Total	5	1.12[0.89,1.40]	0.09	1.07[0.80,1.43]	0.30	1.22[1.05,1.43]	0.98	1.16[0.86,1.56]	0.31
	Asian	3	0.99[0.65,1.50]^#	0.02	1.36[0.96,1.93]	0.70	1.20[0.98,1.46]	0.92	1.36[0.94,1.97]	0.91
	Caucasian	2	1.19[0.94,1.52]	0.78	0.77[0.45,1.30]	0.28	1.27[0.99,1.63]	0.88	0.83[0.48,1.41]	0.28
rs266729C/G	Total	5	0.99[0.90,1.09]	0.19	0.98[0.79,1.22]	0.83	0.96[0.85,1.10]	0.19	0.98[0.78,1.22]	0.53
	Asian	3	1.09[0.96,1.24]	0.73	1.10[0.80,1.51]	0.99	1.14[0.93,1.40]	0.70	1.18[0.84,1.65]	0.91
	Caucasian	2	0.85[0.73,1.00]	0.79	0.89[0.66,1.20]	0.46	0.86[0.72,1.01]	0.82	0.84[0.62,1.14]	0.82
rs822395A/C	Total	3	1.00[0.85,1.19]	0.33	0.83[0.59,1.18]	0.39	1.00[0.76,1.30]	0.11	0.92[0.64,1.32]	0.56
	Asian	2	0.88[0.70,1.12]	0.79	1.42[0.61,3.31]	0.81	0.86[0.67,1.10]	0.72	1.38[0.59,3.22]	0.82
	Caucasian	1	1.14[0.90,1.46]	-	0.75[0.51,1.10]	-	1.25[0.96,1.62]	-	0.84[0.56,1.25]	-
rs822396A/G	Total	3	1.05[0.87,1.25]	0.65	1.00[0.55,1.82]	0.67	1.05[0.87,1.26]	0.75	1.02[0.56,1.86]	0.64
	Asian	2	0.97[0.76,1.24]	0.83	0.70[0.25,1.93]	0.90	0.99[0.77,1.27]	0.84	0.70[0.25,1.93]	0.90
	Caucasian	1	1.15[0.88,1.50]	-	1.23[0.59,2.58]	-	1.14[0.86,1.50]	-	1.27[0.60,2.68]	-

N.: number of studies; ^aTest for heterogeneity. ^#Random-effect model was used when the P for heterogeneity test was ≤ 0.05, otherwise the fixed-effect model was used. CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism; Ht+VR Ho vs. WT Ho, dominant model; VR Ho vs. Ht+WT Ho, recessive model.