Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov 16;42(8):1169–1182. doi: 10.1007/s10964-012-9858-4

Table 4.

Influences of covariates in the total, girls’, and boys’ model

Prediction to Prediction to class OR (95 % CI)
Sample Covariate Intercepta Slopea 1 versus 4 2 versus 4 3 versus 4
Total (n = 3,422) MDS 0.06*** 0.00 1.49 [0.76–2.85] 1.53 [1.25–1.87] 1.42 [1.21–1.67]
LE 0.02** –0.01 1.18 [1.07–1.60] 1.17 [1.10–1.41] 1.09 [1.01–1.21]
LOSS 0.01 –0.00 1.35 [0.61–2.97] 1.27 [0.88–1.85] 1.02 [0.77–1.36]
Gender 0.01 0.08*** 5.49 [2.15–14.00] 2.77 [1.95–3.94] 1.80 [1.43–2.26)
Girls (n = 1,693) MDS 0.04** 0.01 1.34 [0.68–2.65] 1.42 [1.08–1.87] 1.39 [1.10–1.75]
LE 0.02 –0.01 1.25 [0.87–1.80] 1.13 [0.89–1.42] 1.02 [0.86–1.19]
LOSS 0.04 –0.02 1.98 [0.83–4.70] 1.10 [0.68–1.80] 1.12 [0.78–1.61]
Boys (n = 1,729) MDS 0.07*** –0.01 1.68 b [1.20–2.36] 1.43 c [1.14–1.80] d
LE 0.03* –0.01 1.32 b [1.02–1.70] 0.99c [0.84–1.17] d
LOSS –0.03 0.01 1.32b [0.68–2.56] 1.00c [0.63-1.60] d

MDS mothers’ depressive symptoms, LE number of life events, LOSS loss events. Gender was coded with 0 = boys and 1 = girls. Significant values are bold

aValues in columns indicate linear regression coefficients

b1 versus 3

c2 versus 3

dNot defined

p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01, *** p ≤ 0.001