Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jul 18.
Published in final edited form as: Biol Psychol. 2013 Apr 16;93(3):343–351. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.04.002

Table 2.

Frequencies of categorical covariates, and associations with diurnal cortisol and cortisol response to stress at Wave 2.

Covariate Categories Frequencies AUCg Diurnal* CortAtOnset CortDuringTasks CortRecovery
Abuse (assessed at Wave 2) Not abused 71% F(1, 254)=0.01, partial η2=.000 F(1, 282)=1.43, partial η2=.005 F(1, 282)=0.83, partial η2=.003 F(1, 282)=1.86, partial η2=.007
Abused 29%
Mother job level no work 11% F(5, 422)=0.52, partial η2=.006 F(5, 480)=0.91, partial η2=.009 F(5, 480)=0.76, partial η2=.008 F(5, 480)=0.33, partial η2=.003
elementary 4%
lower level 21%
mid level 37%
higher level 21%
academic 7%
Father job level no work/elementary 5% F(4, 401)=0.92, partial η2=.009 F(4, 456)=0.52, partial η2=.005 F(4, 456)=0.98, partial η2=.008 F(4, 456)=0.43, partial η2=.004
lower level 19%
mid level 36%
higher level 27%
academic 13%
Wave 2 Pubertal status (Tanner stage)a II 2% F(3, 207)=2.17, partial η2=.030 F(3, 241)=0.28, partial η2=.003 F(3, 241)=0.36, partial η2=.004 F(3, 241)=0.42, partial η2=.005
III 13%
IV 46%
V 39%

Note. AUCg=Area under the curve with respect to ground;

*

Results of one-way analyses of variance (ANOVAs), where degrees of freedom are in parentheses; None of the ANOVAs were statistically significant at the p<.05 level (two-tailed);

a

There were zero participants in Tanner stage I.