Table 1.
Comparison of the proposed method with other electrochemical methods for determination of NO.
| Electrode | Linear Range (M) | Detection Limit (M) | Ks (s−1) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hb/cyanoethylcellulose-modified glassy carbon electrode | 1.12 × 10−6∼4.72 × 10−5 | 2.0 × 10−8 | — | [39] |
| poly[N-(2-methacryloyloxyethyl)pyrrolidone]-block-poly[glycidylmethacrylate]/Hb- modifiedglassy carbon electrode | 4.5 × 10−7∼10.0 × 10−6 | 3.2 × 10−7 | 1.03 ± 0.05 | [40] |
| cytochrome c/sodium dodecylsulfate/polyacrylamide-modified glassycarbon electrode | 8.0 × 10−7∼9.5 × 10−5 | 1.0 × 10−7 | 1.56 | [41] |
| Hb/gold colloids-modified carbon paste electrode | 9.0 × 10−7∼3.0 × 10−4 | 1.0 × 10−7 | 3.72 | [42] |
| Hb/poly(diallyldimethyl-ammoniumchloride)- functionalized graphenesheets/room temperature ionicliquid-modified glassy carbon electrode | 2.0 × 10−7∼3.26 × 10−5 | 4.0 × 10−8 | — | [43] |
| Hb/didodecyldimethylammonium bromide-modified powder microelectrode | 1.90 × 10−6∼2.8 × 10−5 | 2.0 × 10−7 | — | [44] |
| cytochrome c /polymerized ionic liquid-graphene/BPG electrode | 1.05 × 10−6∼1.37 × 10−5 | 7.0 × 10−7 | 2.39 | [45] |
| Hb/gold nanoparticles/graphene- modified basal plane graphite electrode | 7.2 × 10−7∼7.92 × 10−6 | 1.2 × 10−8 | 48 ± 5 | This work |