Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Sci Res. 2012 May 11;41(5):1307–1319. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.05.008

Table 3.

Attitudes Toward Co-Residence and Respondents’ Explanations (percentages)

Vignette Responses
Good idea Bad idea It
depends
Don’t
know
Total

All Respondents 30 12 54 4 100
Explanations from Open-Ended Follow-up
Good idea Bad idea It depends Don’t know Total

Relationship quality/conflict 0.7 22.7 52.6 35.4 33.1
Family obligation 48.7 0 0.2 0 14.7
Resource constraints 6.2 2.2 7.4 1.9 6.3
Cohabitation 0.1 32.1 2.0 10.0 5.2
Short-term exchange 11.7 0 2.8 0 5.1
Housing 0.1 0.1 8.2 0 4.6
Duration 7.7 1.3 3.1 3.3 4.3
(In)dependence 0 27.7 1.0 6.0 4.0
Responsibility 0.3 1.4 5.7 1.7 3.5
If agree 0.4 0.3 4.6 4.2 2.8
Mother's health 0.2 0.3 4.8 0 2.8
Saves money 8.4 0 0.4 0 2.7
Other 15.5 11.9 7.5 37.5 11.2
Total (%) 100 100 100 100 100

Notes: Explanations are described in the text. Percentages may not sum to 100 due to rounding. Data are weighted. Unweighted N = 3,129 for vignette responses; 2,969 for explanations.