Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Sci Res. 2012 May 11;41(5):1307–1319. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.05.008

Table 6.

Predicted Probabilities of Attitudes toward Intergenerational Co-Residence, by Adult Child’s Union Status and Respondent’s Characteristics

Adult Child
Union Status 		Respondent
Characteristics 		Good idea Bad idea It depends Don’t know
Cohabiting 30 years old .23 .14 .58 .05
Married 30 years old .34 .06 .57 .03
Cohabiting 70 years old .08 .37 .53 .02
Married 70 years old .27 .11 .61 .02
Cohabiting Non-Hispanic White .14 .24 .60 .03
Married Non-Hispanic White .29 .09 .60 .03
Cohabiting Hispanic .31 .18 .46 .05
Married Hispanic .31 .05 .62 .02
Cohabiting Less than HS .21 .27 .39 .13
Married Less than HS .25 .14 .54 .07
Cohabiting HS or more .15 .23 .60 .03
Married HS or more .31 .08 .60 .02

Note: Probabilities are generated using three separate models based on Table 4. Each model adds an interaction between the adult child’s union status and one of the three respondent characteristics: age, race-ethnicity, education. The probabilities are evaluated at the means of the other variables in the model.