Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Cardiol. 2012 Oct 2;111(1):58–62. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.08.048

Table 3.

Multivariate regression model comparing women to men on calls to 9-1-1 during an Acute Coronary Syndrome

Unstable Angina Pectoris Myocardial Infarction
Model Covariate adjustment Prevalence Ratio (95% CI) p value Prevalence Ratio (95% CI) p value
1: Unadjusted 1.18 (0.65–2.15) 0.585 2.01 (1.40–2.87) <0.001
2: Model 1 + sociodemographic factors* 0.96 (0.53–1.71) 0.879 1.93(1.33–2.81) 0.001
3: Model 2 + history of MI 0.89 (0.50–1.59) 0.696 1.93 (1.33–2.80) 0.001
4: Model 3 + symptoms 0.92 (0.51–1.65) 0.770 1.80 (1.22–2.65) 0.003
5: Model 4 + LVEF/GRACE 0.97 (0.51–1.84) 0.919 1.78 (1.21–2.63) 0.004

LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction. GRACE, Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events

*

Age (continuous), race/ethnicity, Medicaid/Medicare, insurance over the prior 2 years, education and marital status.

Symptoms include nausea/vomiting, syncope, and symptom presentation (constant vs. inconstant).