Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 18;8(7):e67551. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067551

Table 1. Gating properties of DmNav variants with or without TipE or TEH1.

Activation
Fast Inactivation
Slow inactivation
V1/2 (mV)
k (mV)
V1/2 (mV)
k (mV)
V1/2 (mV)
k (mV)
DmNav9-1 -29.0 ± 1.1 5.5 ± 0.7 -41.4 ± 0.8 4.8 ± 0.2 -44.5 ± 1.8 5.6 ± 0.8
DmNav9-1 + TipE -26.2 ± 0.5 5.2 ± 0.2 -42.1 ± 0.7 5.1 ± 0.1 -44.9 ± 1.4 5.5 ± 0.2
DmNav9-1 + TEH1 -41.1 ± 1.1* 4.6 ± 0.2 -51.7 ± 0.6* 5.0 ± 0.1 -60.2 ± 0.5* 5.0 ± 0.3
DmNav26 -25.7 ± 0.2 3.4 ± 0.3 -34.1 ± 0.1 4.1 ± 0.2 -45.6 ± 0.2 5.0 ± 0.3
DmNav26 + TipE -24.7 ± 0.6 3.4 ± 0.4 -40.8 ± 0.4* 4.2 ± 0.2 -44.1 ± 0.7 4.5 ± 0.4
DmNav26 + TEH1 -33.6 ± 0.6* 3.1 ± 0.4 -42.6 ± 0.6* 4.6 ± 0.1 -50.6 ± 0.3* 4.5 ± 0.5
DmNav22 -26.7 ± 1.1 5.8 ± 0.5 -40.7 ± 0.6 4.8 ± 0.1 -49.2 ± 0.2 3.7 ± 0.2
DmNav22 + TipE -25.1 ± 1.2 7.2 ± 0.5 -38.9 ± 0.5 4.8 ± 0.2 -45.5 ± 0.8 5.3 ± 0.2
DmNav22 + TEH1 -32.1 ± 0.7* 6.2 ± 0.3 -48.3 ± 0.6* 5.2 ± 0.1 -57.9 ± 0.7* 4.8 ± 0.1

Data represent mean ± SEM for 12-20 oocytes. DmNav 9 1, DmNa v 26, and DmNav 22 are treated as control of each group.

*

Significantly different from that of DmNav channel only using one-way ANOVA with Scheffe’s post hoc analysis (p<0.05).