Table A5.
Statistical results from ANOVA analysis on planned comparison between session 1 and session 2 of healthy comparison (HC) participants to evaluate the effects of practice on coordination accuracy and stability.
| Factor(s) | Coordination accuracy | Main significant finding | Coordination stability | Main significant finding |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Session | F(1, 10) = 0.01, p = 0.9 | N/A | F(1, 10) = 18.31, p < 0.01* | Less variability in session 2 |
| Condition | F(2, 20) = 9.18, p < 0.01* | Greater accuracy in no vision and normal vision | F(2, 20) = 11.4, p < 0.001* | Less variability in no vision and normal vision |
| Phase | F(1, 10) = 14.6, p < 0.01* | Greater accuracy in in-phase | F(1, 10) = 20.51, p < 0.01* | Less variability in in-phase |
| Required cycle frequency | F(5, 50) = 33.64, p < 0.001* | Less accuracy at fastest frequency (2 Hz) | F(5, 50) = 51.03, p < 0.001* | More variability at fastest frequency (2 Hz) |
| Session × condition | F(2, 20) = 0.38, p = 0.7 | N/A | F(2, 20) = 4.28, p < 0.05* | See Section “Coordination Stability” under Section “Healthy Comparison Participants – Effects of Practice” |
* denotes significance below p < 0.05