Skip to main content
. 2013 May 31;84(3):286–291. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2013.792029

Table 1.

Basal characteristics of clinical trials included in the analysis

Author Year Age No. of fract. (EF/IF) Femal (EF/IF) Classification of fractures IF EF Follow-up (months) Outcomes measured Jadad score
Grewal et al. 2011 18–75 26 /27 18/20 AO type A, C1, C2, C3 Volar locking plates and dorsal Pi plates Bridging fixators + suppl. K-wires 12 PRWE and DASH scores, grip strength, ROM, radiographic results and complications. 3
Wilcke et al. 2011 20–70 30 /33 23/25 AO type A, C1 Volar locking plates Bridging fixators ± suppl. K-wires 12 PRWE and DASH scores, grip strength, ROM, radiographic results and complications. 3
Wei et al. 2009 >18 22/12 16/8 AO type A3, C1, C2, C3 Locked radial column plates and volar locking plates Bridging fixators + suppl. K-wires 12 DASH score, grip and lateral pinch strength, ROM, pain scores, radiographic results and complications. 4
Abramo et al. 2009 20–65 24/26 17/19 AO type A1–3, C1–3 The TriMed system Bridging fixators + suppl. K-wires 12 DASH score, grip strength, ROM, pain scores, radiographic results and complications. 3
Xu et al. 2009 21–56 14/16 5/7 AO type C A variety of non-locking plates. Bridging fixators ± suppl. K-wires 24 The Green and O’Brien scoring, grip strength, ROM, radiographic results and domplications. 2
Egol et al. 2008 18–87 44/44 22/25 AO type A, B, C Volar locking plates Bridging fixators ± suppl. K-wires 12 DASH score, grip strength, ROM, radiographic results and complications. 3
Leung et al. 2008 17–60 74/70 AO type C1, C2, C3 Nonlocking T-plates, combined volar and dorsal plate fixationa Bridging fixators ± suppl. K-wires 24 Gartland and Werley point system, Green and O’Brien clinical score, arthritis grade, daily activities, social activities, interference of normal work and complications. 3
Grewal et al. 2005 <70 33/29 12/17 AO type C Locked dorsal Pi plate Bridging fixators + suppl. K-wires 24 DASH scores, SF36 scores, grip and pinch strength, ROM, radiographic results, surgical outcomes and complications. 2
Kreder et al. 2005 16–75 88/91 38/32 AO type B, C Small or mini-fragment plate Bridging fixators ± suppl. K-wires 24 MFA function test, SF36 scores, Jebsen score, grip strength and pinch strength, three-jaw chuck and pad-to-pad pinch strength, ROM, radiographic results and complications. 3
Kapoor et al. 2000 28/29 8/10 Frykman’s type III, IV, VII, VIII Small T plates Bridging fixators 48 Grip strength, radiographic results, Sarmiento functional score and complications. 1

a The latter was done for more comminuted fractures

PRWE: Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation.

DASH: Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand.

ROM: Range of motion.