Table 1.
Comparison of IFA and the alamarBlue assay for enumeration of C. trachomatis infection
Dilution of EB | Infection level (%) 24 hpi in IFA | Reducing capability of infected cells relative to the mock-infected cellsa |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
24 hpi |
48 hpi |
72 hpi |
||||||||
Avg (%) | SD (%) | Z′ factor | Avg (%) | SD (%) | Z′ factor | Avg (%) | SD (%) | Z′ factor | ||
1:1 | 95.77 | 26.40 | 1.36 | 0.56* | 6.90 | 0.68 | 0.83* | 4.21 | 0.08 | 0.98* |
1:2 | 92.94 | 61.80 | 3.66 | −0.02 | 18.83 | 0.89 | 0.79* | 6.13 | 0.28 | 0.97* |
1:4 | 90.64 | 87.84 | 4.71 | −2.47 | 46.35 | 0.27 | 0.72* | 13.42 | 1.59 | 0.92* |
1:8 | 86.70 | 103.00 | 6.16 | −14.50 | 69.27 | 0.78 | 0.47 | 27.96 | 2.17 | 0.88* |
1:16 | 63.95 | 107.29 | 2.15 | −3.74 | 85.86 | 2.26 | −0.47 | 49.17 | 2.91 | 0.79* |
1:32 | 43.61 | 109.90 | 5.82 | −3.60 | 96.11 | 1.15 | −3.50 | 74.03 | 2.82 | 0.60* |
1:64 | 20.80 | 114.35 | 4.43 | −1.88 | 106.17 | 0.42 | −1.48 | 85.67 | 1.35 | 0.57* |
1:128 | 14.79 | 119.60 | 9.48 | −1.88 | 99.23 | 5.43 | −38.28 | 88.67 | 2.00 | 0.29 |
1:256 | 7.20 | 114.30 | 0.77 | −1.13 | 102.47 | 0.49 | −5.27 | 100.06 | 0.72 | −75.83 |
1:512 | 3.06 | 108.15 | 8.51 | −5.58 | 105.74 | 0.61 | −1.76 | 100.58 | 0.47 | −4.98 |
1:1,024 | 2.16 | 102.65 | 4.24 | −14.41 | 103.46 | 1.90 | −4.71 | 102.67 | 2.49 | −2.57 |
1:2,048 | 1.08 | 120.76 | 8.34 | −1.56 | 108.26 | 0.66 | −0.94 | 103.06 | 0.50 | −0.17 |
1:4,096 | 0.98 | 109.81 | 0.48 | −2.01 | 108.17 | 2.61 | −1.67 | 105.87 | 0.66 | 0.31 |
R2 | 0.52 | 0.79 | 0.98 |
Z′ factors of <1 and ≥0.5 (marked with asterisks) are indicative of an assay with suitable screening characteristics (14). SD, standard deviation.