Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jul 19.
Published in final edited form as: Popul Stud (Camb). 2011 Sep 14;65(3):253–271. doi: 10.1080/00324728.2011.598942

Table 3. Percentage of cases of unprotected last coitus by sex, age group, and genotype among adolescents, United States 1994-2002.

Males (N=1971) Females (N=2092)

Genotype Age ≤18 (N) Age >18 (N) Age ≤ 18 (N) Age >18 (N)

DAT1
 9R/9R 25.71 (35) 30.19 (53) 27.59 (29) 20.37 (54)
 9R/10R 25.29 (257) 23.82 (382) 39.27 (275) 34.07 (408)
 10R/10R 29.18 (490) 30.04 (669) 31.60 (519) 31.96 (751)
 −/− 20.00 (40) 26.67 (45) 44.44 (27) 20.69 (29)
DRD2
 A1/A1 15.63 (64) 22.22 (90) 29.87 (77) 20.83 (96)
 A2/A2 27.70 (444) 25.73 (614) 33.49 (433) 31.14 (684)
 A1/A2 29.30 (314) 31.91 (445) 36.47 (340) 35.28 (462)
MAOA
 2R/− 37.50 (16) 45.45 (11) 58.62 (29) 48.39 (31)
 −/− 27.17 (806) 27.68 (1138) 33.50 (821) 31.46 (1211)

Boldface indicates that the results are consistent with the following hypotheses: (1) DAT1*9R/9R respondents have lower rates of unprotected sex than other DAT1 genotypes; (2) DRD2*A1/A2 respondents have higher rates of unprotected sex than other DRD2 genotypes; and (3)MAOA*2R respondents have higher rates of unprotected sex than other MAOA genotypes. Formal hypothesis tests are presented in Table 4. The symbol ‘−‘ indicates an unlisted allele (e.g., neither 9R nor 10R for DAT1 gene).

Source: As for Table 1.