Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013 Mar 14;132(0):195–201. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.02.009

Table 3.

Activation to cocaine versus neutral cues post-study versus pre-study

Contrast Cluster Z Max P Voxel MNI (x, y, z) Anatomy
Pre-study >
Post-study
1 5.05 < .001 341 6, 14, −1 R nucleus accumbens
4.60 −6, 17, −1 L nucleus accumbens
4.18 −3, 8, −7 L cerebral cortex (BA 25)
2 4.68 < .001 1302 −24, 41, 41 L frontal pole
4.56 18, 29, 41 R cerebral white matter
4.36 −15, 35, 53 L superior frontal gyrus
3 4.18 .036 70 −39, 14, 41 L middle frontal gyrus
4 4.13 .003 163 48, −13, −16 R insular cortex
4.11 33, −22, 5 R insular cortex
4.06 33, −16, −7 R cerebral white matter
5 4.00 .009 120 45, 44, 8 R frontal pole (BA 10)
3.92 54, 23, 5 R inferior frontal gyrus
3.71 57, 26, 14 R inferior frontal gyrus
6 3.85 .040 67 −45, −40, 5 L cerebral white matter
3.42 −48, −52, −1 L cerebral white matter
3.40 −54, −37, 2 L middle temporal gyrus, posterior

Note: Analyses (within-subjects main effect of MRI session from 2×2 mixed effects ANOVA) completed using cluster thresholding (z > 3.32 and corrected cluster threshold of p < .05). Anatomy = most probable region identified using the Harvard-Oxford cortical and subcortical structural atlases; Brodmann areas (where available) identified by the Talairach-Tournoux Atlas. Z Max = local maximum z-value, P = cluster-level p value, MNI (x, y, z) = Montreal Neurological Institute coordinates for the local maximum, BA = Brodmann Area.