Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 6;10:224. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-10-224

Table 1.

Assay statistics and reproducibility

A. Fluorescent plate scanner and whole-well signal integration
 
 
Sensitivity (LOD) units/ml Variability intra-assay COV (%)
Variability inter-assay COV (%)
    Assay1 Assay 2 Assay 3 Assay 4
IFNα
VSV-DsRed2
1.51 +/− 0.12
0.9
2.9
0.7
1.7
2.4
VSV-ZsGreen
2.07 +/− 0.94
1.8
8.6
5.5
3.3
16.0
IFNβ
VSV-DsRed2
1.71 +/− 0.27
1.4
1.1
0.6
1.0
5.1
VSV-ZsGreen
2.57 +/− 0.52
1.9
4.1
2.2
3.2
7.9
B. Fluorescence/absorbance plate reader
 
 
Sensitivity (LOD) units/ml
Variability intra-assay COV (%)
Variability inter-assay COV (%)
 
 
Assay 1
Assay 2
Assay 3
Assay 4
 
 
VSV-DsRed2
1.29 +/− 0.34
4.0
1.7
1.9
5.7
5.7
IFNα
VSV-ZsGreen
0.96 +/−0.18
1.2
1.1
1.7
2.5
3.6
 
Crystal violet
4.09 +/− 0.43
17.5
14.0
7.3
8.6
21.9
 
VSV-DsRed2
2.71 +/− 0.29
3.0
1.8
1.7
3.6
6.4
IFNβ
VSV-ZsGreen
1.87 +/− 0.11
2.3
3.1
0.7
1.8
4.4
  Crystal violet 8.44 +/− 2.28 20.1 6.6 4.3 7.3 18.5

Viral replication reporters and two methods of signal measurement were tested for the functional antiviral assays and calculated IC50 values statistically compared with the traditional crystal violet antiviral assay. Coefficients of variance were calculated with a minimum of four replicates. +/− values are 95% confidence intervals over all samples.