Table 3.
Binding sites for Ramos T30 using separate models for replicates and taking the intersection (top) and the union (bottom) of regions identified by individual analyses at an 0.1% FDR (column 2), compared to a joint analysis of replicates at the same FDR (column 3)
|
Experiment |
Identified using the intersection |
Additionally identified |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| of separate models | using joint model | |||||
| |
Number |
Number |
% |
Number |
Number |
% |
| |
|
containing |
containing |
|
containing |
containing |
| |
|
TSS |
TSS |
|
TSS |
TSS |
| CBPT301 & CBPT302 |
5903 |
1444 |
24.46% |
9659 |
1942 |
20.11% |
| p300T301 & p300T302 |
22984 |
5926 |
25.78% |
9861 |
2676 |
27.14% |
| |
Identified using the union |
Additionally identified |
||||
| |
of separate models |
using joint model |
||||
| |
Number |
Number |
% |
Number |
Number |
% |
| |
|
containing |
containing |
|
containing |
containing |
| |
|
TSS |
TSS |
|
TSS |
TSS |
| CBPT301 & CBPT302 |
22762 |
4601 |
20.21% |
18844 |
3870 |
20.54% |
| p300T301 & p300T302 | 43003 | 10156 | 23.62% | 22765 | 1786 | 7.85% |