Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Sci Res. 2013 Mar 22;42(5):1402–1409. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.03.004

Table 1.

Key Features of Studies with Biosamples Collected and Returned Via Mail by the Respondents

Authors, publication year Location Mode of biosample request Biosample collected Number of participants (response rate) Study inclusion criteria
Avendano et al., 2011 Netherlands Web Blood, saliva 31, 30 (15.5, 15%) Participants in Dutch Longitudinal Internet study for the Social Sciences
Bauer et al., 2004 USA Mail Saliva 110 (37%) Participants in Community Intervention Trial for Smoking Cessation
Bloomfield et al., 2003 San Francisco Mail Urine 70 (22.4%) Patients previously tested positive for chlamydia
Boyle et al., 2010 Florida Telephone Saliva 637 (41.3%) Individuals from Florida counties directly affected by 2004 Hurricanes
Cozier et al., 2004 USA Mail Buccal cells 56–64 (35–40%) Black women who had reported a diagnosis of breast, colorectal, or lung cancer
Crider et al., 2006 Atlanta Telephone Buccal cells 765 (47.6%) Pregnant women
Egan et al., 2003 USA Telephone Mucosal DNA 791, 797 (60%, 50%) Women aged 20–69 who were residents of Massachusetts or Wisconsin in 1997–1998
Etter and Bullen, 2011 Canada, France, Italy Switzerland, UK, USA Web Saliva 31 (16%) Electronic nicotine delivery systems users
Etter and Perneger, 2001 Geneva Mail Saliva 98 (25%) Current smokers and ex- smokers who had quit in the past two years
Etter et al., 2005 Switzerland E-Mail Buccal cells, saliva 315 (80%) Visitors of a smoking cessation website
Feigelson et al., 2001 USA Face-to-face Buccal cells 24 (69%) American Cancer Society National Home Office Research Department
Fidler et al., 2011 England Mail Saliva 1702 (24%) Current smokers and recent quitters
Freeman et al., 1997 UK, Germany Mail Buccal cells 114, 116 (73%, 92%) Participants in a twin study of children and a twin study of adults
Halpern et al., 2012 North Carolina, Ohio, Texas Face-to-face Saliva 146 (76%) Sample of participants in the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health
Hansen et al., 2007 Denmark Mail Buccal cells, saliva 38–72 (72–80%) Female nurses aged 51+ and member of Danish Nurses Organization
Kang et al., 2011 Republic of Korea Mail Buccal cells 13084 (29.2%) Sample of participants in the Korea Medical Insurance Corporation prospective cohort study
Kozlowski et al., 2002 USA Mail, telephone Buccal cells 870 (26%) Aged 18+ recruited using random digit dialing methods
Le Merchand et al., 2001 Hawaii Mail Buccal cells 239 (67%) Sample of participants in the Multiethnic Cohort Study
Margolis et al., 2011 USA Mail Buccal cells 732 (22.4%) Children with atopic dermatitis from the Pediatric Eczema Elective Registry Program
Osmond et al., 2000 Chicago, LA, NYC, San Francisco Telephone Saliva 412 (67%) Men who have sex with men
Rylander-Rudqvist et al., 2006 Sweden Mail Saliva 490 (80%) Swedish men aged 53–87