Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2013 Aug;12(8):1328–1340. doi: 10.1039/c3pp25430e

Table 5.

Vertical lowest lying singlet excited state energies (ΔE) in eV and oscillator strength (f) of 8-oxoG-C and 8-oxoG-C base pairs in solution (ε = 78.4) calculated using the PCM-TD-ωB97XD/6–31G* method.

8-oxoG-C

State Transition ΔE (eV) f Configuration Naturea
S1 8-oxoG(π) → 8-oxoG(π*) 4.80 0.1570 ~46% LE
S2 C(π) → C(π*) 5.22 0.2096 ~44% LE
S3 8-oxoG(π) → 8-oxoG(π*) 5.76 0.4277 ~44% LE
S4 8-oxoG(π) → C(π*) 5.93 0.0012 ~47% CT
S5 8-oxoG(n), C(π) → C(π*) 6.05 0.0396 ~25%; delocalized on 8-oxoG and C LE

8-oxoG-A

S1 8-oxoG(π) → 8-oxoG(π*) 4.73 0.2531 ~43% LE
S2 A(π) → A(π*) 5.42 0.2498 ~29% LE
S3 A(π) → A(π*) 5.47 0.0688 ~24% LE
S4 8-oxoG(π) → 8-oxoG(π*) 5.62 0.3621 ~45% LE
S5 A(n) → A(π*) 5.71 0.0004 ~36% LE
S6 8-oxoG(π) → A(π*) 6.03 0.0011 ~43% CT
S7 8-oxoG(n) → 8-oxoG(π*) 6.12 0.0001 ~24% LE
a

LE= local excitation; CT= charge transfer.