Table 2.
Statistical comparison of wrist angle (adduction) pre- versus post-lesion for horizontal slots.
| H1 | H2 | H3 | H4 | Functional recovery (%) | |
| CERVICAL CORD LESION MONKEYS | |||||
| Mk-S-C-HA | Sig. (pre > post) | Sig. (pre > post) | Sig. (pre > post) | Sig. (pre > post) | 41 |
| T, p = < 0.001 | MW, p = 0.009 | MW, p = 0.005 | T, p = < 0.001 | ||
| Mk-S-C-ST | Sig. (pre > post) | Sig. (pre > post) | Sig. (pre > post) | Sig. (pre > post) | 0 |
| MW, p = < 0.001 | MW, p = < 0.001 | MW, p = < 0.001 | MW, p = < 0.001 | ||
| Mk-S-C-BE | n.s. | n.s. | Sig.(pre < post) | n.s. | 79 |
| MW, p = 0.248 | T, p = 0.906 | T, p = < 0.001 | T, p = 0.237 | ||
| Mk-S-A-FR | Sig. (pre > post) | Sig. (pre > post) | n.s. | Sig. (pre > post) | 52 |
| T, p = 0.004 | T, p = 0.002 | T, p = 0.117 | T, p = 0.004 | ||
| Mk-S-A-MO | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | Sig. (pre > post) | 71 |
| T, p = 0.134 | T, p = 0.345 | T, p = 0.119 | T, p = 0.021 | ||
| Mk-S-A-CO | n.s. | n.s. | Sig. (pre < post) | n.s. | 100 |
| T, p = 0.877 | T, p = 0.159 | T, p = 0.006 | MW, p = 0.328 | ||
| MOTOR CORTEX LESION MONKEYS | |||||
| Mk-C-C-GE | Sig. (pre > post) | Sig. (pre > post) | Sig. (pre > post) | Sig. (pre > post) | 11 |
| (T, p = 0.005) | (MW, p = 0.003) | (T, p = 0.003) | (T, p = 0.027) | ||
| Mk-C-C-RO | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | 90 |
| T, p = 0.795 | MW, p = 0.069 | T, p = 0.183 | T, p = 0.693 | ||
| Mk-C-C-BI | Sig. (pre < post) | Sig. (pre < post) | n.s. | Sig. (pre < post) | 36 |
| T, p = < 0.001 | T, p = < 0.001 | T, p = 0.224 | T, p = < 0.001 | ||
| Mk-C-A-VA | Sig. (pre < post) | n.s. | Sig. (pre < post) | Sig. (pre < post) | 91 |
| T, p = 0.037 | T, p = 0.167 | T, p = 0.040 | T, p = 0.020 | ||
| Mk-C-A-SL | Sig. (pre > post) | Sig. (pre > post) | Sig. (pre > post) | Sig. (pre > post) | 77 |
| MW, p = < 0.001 | MW, p = < 0.001 | T, p = < 0.001 | T, p = < 0.001 | ||
| Mk-C-A-MO | n.s. | Sig. (pre > post) | n.s. | n.s. | 60 |
| T, p = 0.109 | T, p = 0.009 | T, p = 0.698 | T, p = 0.750 | ||
H1–H4 refer for the four horizontal slots analyzed in the modified Brinkman board task (Figure 1C). The table shows if there was a significant difference (“Sig.”) in wrist adduction angle in the pre-lesion versus post-lesion phase and which one showed the larger angle. The second line for each monkey shows which statistical test was used (T, Student T-test, MW, Mann–Whitney) and the corresponding p value.