Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jul 22.
Published in final edited form as: J Couns Psychol. 2013 Feb 18;60(2):265–278. doi: 10.1037/a0031650

Table 5.

Multilevel Model of Change in Frequency of GPA and Academic Motivation Over Time, With Between-Person Effects of Key Predictors on Time 1 GPA and Academic Motivation, and the Within-Person Effect of Peer Emotional Support on Within-Person GPA and Academic Amotivation Estimation

Predictor GPA
Academic amotivation
γ SE γ SE
Intercept 3.51*** .06 1.32*** .11
Gender .05 .03 −.08 .05
Age minus;.01 .01 minus;.02* .00
Marital status .14*** .04 minus;.11 .06
Part time versus full time minus;.01 .04 .03 .08
Military status minus;.09 .06 .04 .11
Time .01 .01 .13* .04
BP emotional support .02* .01 minus;.03* .01
WP emotional support .00 .00 .00 .01

Note. Convergence criterion = .001. Gender (male = −1, female = 1), marital status (unmarried = −1, married = 1), and full- versus part-time student status (−1 = part time, 1 = full time) were effect coded. Military status (0 = civilian, 1 = student service member/veteran) was dummy coded. BP emotional support denotes Level 2 (grand mean-centered) index of emotional support. WP emotional support denotes Level 1 (person mean-centered) index of emotional support. Between-person variables (Level 2) estimate effects on level of the outcome, which was centered to Time 1. Within-person variables (Level 1) estimate the rate of change in the outcome. GPA = grade-point average; BP = between person; WP = within person.

p < .10.

*

p < .05.

***

p < .001.