Table 1.
Variable | CET (N = 24)
|
EST (N = 22)
|
Test | p | ES | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | % | N | % | ||||
Competitively Employed | 13 | 54% | 4 | 18% | LR = 6.34 | .009 | φ = .37 |
Job Status | |||||||
Full time | 6 | 25% | 3 | 14% | LR = .96 | .327 | φ = .14 |
Part time | 7 | 29% | 1 | 5% | LR = 5.40 | .020 | φ = .33 |
Employment Pattern | LR = 14.30 | .003 | V = .50 | ||||
Achieved employment | 10 | 42% | 2 | 9% | |||
Maintained employment | 3 | 12% | 2 | 9% | |||
Lost employment | 0 | 0% | 6 | 27% | |||
Job Categorya | LR = 7.53 | .110 | V = .38 | ||||
Professional | 1 | 5% | 0 | 0% | |||
Clerical/sales | 5 | 23% | 1 | 5% | |||
Skilled manual labor | 1 | 5% | 0 | 0% | |||
Unskilled labor | 4 | 18% | 3 | 14% | |||
| |||||||
M | SD | M | SD | ||||
| |||||||
Weekly Earnings | 207.92 | 337.97 | 69.77 | 156.47 | U = 1044 | .044 | d = .53 |
Satisfaction with Employment Statusb | 2.46 | 1.56 | 3.77 | 1.69 | t = −2.74 | .009 | d = −.81 |
Note. CET = Cognitive Enhancement Therapy, EST = Enriched Supportive Therapy, ES = Effect Size
Job category data were missing for two employed individuals who received CET
1 = Very satisfied, 2 = Moderately satisfied, 3 = Mildly satisfied, 4 = Neutral, 5 = Mildly dissatisfied, 6 = Moderately dissatisfied, 7 = Very dissatisfied