Skip to main content
. 2012 May 16;2012(5):CD005111. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005111.pub3

Comparison 7. Acupuncture versus no specific treatment.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Symptom severity (responders) (short‐term: up to 3 mons, closest to 8 wks) 2 181 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 2.11 [1.18, 3.79]
2 Symptom severity (mean outcomes) post‐treatment scores (short‐term: up to 3 mos, closest to 8 wks) 2 181 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐1.29 [‐2.59, 0.01]
3 Quality of life (mean outcomes) post‐treatment scores (short‐term: up to 3 mos, closest to 8 wks) 1 155 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.34 [0.02, 0.66]
4 Quality of life (responders) (short‐term: up to 3 mons, closest to 8 wks) 1 155 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.43 [0.65, 3.14]