Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 22;202(2):251–260. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201304052

Table 1.

Comparison of state-to-state frequency and growth/shrinkage rate between control and MoesinT559D- and MoesinK212,213M,T559D-expressing cells

State to state and rates Control MoesinT559D MoesinK211,212M,T559D
G → S
(ns−1) 0.0114 (44) 0.0055 (13) 0.0125 (20)
(ns−1) 0.0085–0.0148 0.0031–0.0091 0.0079–0.0184
P = 0.0139a P = 0.714
G → P
(ns−1) 0.0569 (220) 0.062 (146) 0.0579 (93)
(ns−1) 0.0527–0.0609 0.0569–0.0665 0.0525–0.0635
P = 0.134 P = 0.783
S → G
(ns−1) 0.0110 (37) 0.0142 (22) 0.0062 (12)
(ns−1) 0.0079–0.0147 0.0092–0.0203 0.0034–0.0104
P = 0.298 P = 0.0788
S → P
(ns−1) 0.0564 (190) 0.0544 (84) 0.0543 (105)
(ns−1) 0.0521–0.0605 0.0481–0.0602 0.0483–0.0595
P = 0.589 P = 0.566
P → G
(ns−1) 0.0271 (148) 0.0177 (85) 0.0192 (54)
(ns−1) 0.0229–0.0318 0.0139–0.0218 0.0143–0.0248
P = 0.0047b P = 0.037a
P → S
(ns−1) 0.0216 (118) 0.0121 (58) 0.0214 (60)
(ns−1) 0.018–0.0256 0.009–0.0158 0.0161–0.0275
P = 0.0014c P = 0.9401
Pause state
(%) 67.3 (3,421) 78.2 (3,235) 69.6 (1,863)
(%) 66.0–68.6 76.9–79.4 67.8–71.3
Shrinkage state
(%) 14.8 (752) 8.3 (343) 15.8 (422)
(%) 13.8–15.8 7.5–9.2 14.4–17.2
Growth state
(%) 17.9 (912) 13.5 (558) 14.6 (391)
(%) 16.9–19.0 12.5–14.6 13.3–16.0
Growth rate
(µm/min) 2.68 2.39 2.55
(µm/min) ±0.052 ±0.063 ±0.078
P = 4.3.10−4c P=0.141
Shrinkage rate
(µm/min) 2.61 2.54 2.46
(µm/min) ±0.058 ±0.09 ±0.078
P = 0.552 P = 0.159

Bold numbers denote statistically significant different values from controls. Numbers in parentheses indicate the event count. Intervals indicate 95% confidence. Statistical significance for sate-to-state transition frequencies was determined using a two-tailed permutation test with 10,000 resamples. For growth and shrinkage rates, a two-sample t test was used to determine statistical significance (±SEM).

a

Statistically different from control if P < 0.05.

b

P < 0.01.

c

P < 0.001.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure