Table II.
Difference in child leg length (95% confidence interval) (cm) |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model 1 | r 2 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | Model 5 | p for sex interaction | |
Mother’s education | |||||||
Initial/incomplete/common secondary | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Advanced secondary/partial university | 0.43 | 0.45 | 0.32 | 0.32 | 0.15 | ||
(0.29,0.57) | (0.31,0.60) | (0.18,0.47) | (0.18,0.47) | (0.03,0.27) | |||
Completed university | 0.91 | 0.92 | 0.63 | 0.62 | 0.29 | ||
(0.67,1.14) | (0.68,1.15) | (0.38,0.87) | (0.38,0.87) | (0.07,0.51) | |||
p-value for trend | < 0.01 | 0.010 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | 0.77 |
Father’s education | |||||||
Initial/incomplete/common secondary | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Advanced secondary/partial university | 0.15 | 0.18 | 0.09 | 0.09 | −0.02 | ||
(−0.06,0.36) | (− 0.03,0.38) | (− 0.09,0.28) | (− 0.09,0.27) | (− 0.19,0.15) | |||
Completed university | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.34 | 0.34 | 0.03 | ||
(0.36,0.77) | (0.37,0.79) | (0.15,0.53) | (0.15,0.53) | (−0.14,0.20) | |||
p-value for trend | < 0.01 | 0.005 | < 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.90 | 0.43 |
Highest household occupation | |||||||
Manual worker | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Non-manual worker | 0.49 | 0.51 | 0.32 | 0.32 | 0.09 | ||
(0.35,0.64) | (0.36,0.65) | (0.17,0.47) | (0.17,0.47) | (−0.06,0.24) | |||
p-value for trend | < 0.01 | 0.008 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | 0.22 | 0.81 |
Model 1: adjusted for urban or rural residence and East or West of Belarus.
Model 2: as Model 1 and additionally adjusted for study trial arm for breastfeeding promotion.
Model 3: as Model 2 and additionally adjusted for: parent’s age, smoking and alcohol intake, number of older and younger siblings.
Model 4: as Model 3 and additionally adjusted for: hospitalizations in infancy or childhood for any reason.
Model 5: as Model 4 and additionally adjusted for: mid-parental height.
Robust standard errors were used to compute confidence intervals and p-values to account for clustering by polyclinic.