Table III.
Difference in child trunk length (95% confidence interval) (cm) |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model 1 | r 2 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | Model 5 | p for sex interaction | |
Mother’s education | |||||||
Initial/incomplete/common secondary | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Advanced secondary/partial university | 0.54 | 0.57 | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.29 | ||
(0.37,0.71) | (0.42,0.72) | (0.29,0.60) | (0.28,0.60) | (0.15,0.43) | |||
Completed university | 0.95 | 0.97 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.42 | ||
(0.71,1.19) | (0.74,1.19) | (0.45,0.98) | (0.45,0.98) | (0.20,0.64) | |||
p-value for trend | < 0.01 | 0.018 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | 0.57 |
Father’s education | |||||||
Initial/incomplete/common secondary | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Advanced secondary/partial university | 0.30 | 0.34 | 0.26 | 0.25 | 0.16 | ||
(0.08,0.53) | (0.14,0.54) | (0.07,0.44) | (0.07,0.44) | (− 0.02,0.34) | |||
Completed university | 0.63 | 0.65 | 0.45 | 0.45 | 0.18 | ||
(0.41,0.86) | (0.44,0.87) | (0.23,0.67) | (0.23,0.67) | (− 0.01,0.38) | |||
p-value for trend | < 0.01 | 0.011 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.55 |
Highest household occupation | |||||||
Manual worker | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Non-manual worker | 0.53 | 0.54 | 0.36 | 0.36 | 0.16 | ||
(0.35,0.70) | (0.39,0.70) | (0.21,0.51) | (0.21,0.51) | (0.01,0.31) | |||
p-value for trend | < 0.01 | 0.014 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.32 |
Model 1: adjusted for urban or rural residence and East or West of Belarus.
Model 2: as Model 1 and additionally adjusted for study trial arm for breastfeeding promotion.
Model 3: as Model 2 and additionally adjusted for: parent’s age, smoking and alcohol intake, number of older and younger siblings.
Model 4: as Model 3 and additionally adjusted for: hospitalizations in infancy or childhood for any reason.
Model 5: as Model 4 and additionally adjusted for: mid-parental height.
Robust standard errors were used to compute confidence intervals and p-values to account for clustering by polyclinic.