Skip to main content
. 2012 Apr-Jun;13(2):71–80.

Table 2.

Studies examining marital relationship in infertility

Studies Design Sample characteristics/Country Assessment Key findings related to marital relationship
Ulbrich et al. (1990), (39) Cross-sectional study Convenient sampling: 103 married couples from Resolve and physicians. USA Dyadic Adjustment Scale Infertile couples are generally similar in the way of perceiving their marital adjustment, but they arrive at that view by different routes
Berg et al. (1991), (40) Cross-sectional study Convenient sampling:104 married couples from Resolve and clinic, with primary infertility currently involved in treatment. USA Locke-Wallace Marital Adjustment Test 1. Couples experienced normal levels of marital adjustment, and with no significant gender differences
2. Couples experienced a stable marital adjustment in the pursuing treatment in year 1 and year 2, but deteriorated after the third year
Pepe et al. (1991), (41) Cross-sectional study Convenient sampling: 40 female patients had been diagnosed with primary or secondary infertility. USA Index of Marital Satisfaction Infertility treatment was related to decreased marital satisfaction, but after the termination of treatment, the relationship returned to a level not significantly different from its pretreatment level
Benazon et al. (1992), (52) A longitudinal study Convenient sampling: During the 12 months of the study, all participants were categorized into two groups: 48 couples with pregnancy, 117 couples with nonpregnancy. Canada Dyadic Adjustment Scale 1, Significant decreases in marital functioning were experienced by subjects as the treatment investigation progressed
2. Greater levels of marital distress were observed in couples that did not conceive. Significant gender differences were observed
Slade et al. (1992), (54) A longitudinal study Convenient sampling: 28 couples with primary infertility. England Dyadic Adjustment Scale 1. For the infertile groups, marital adjustment tended to deteriorate over time, however, this was paralleled in the fertile groups
2. Self-blame was correlated with marital difficulties in the females; self-blame and detachment were particularly linked with marital difficulties in the males
Levin et al. (1997), (42) Cross-sectional study Convenient sampling: 46 couples undergoing different stages of infertility treatment. USA Dyadic Adjustment Scale Marital distress in the infertility population is impacted by the intra-couple coping methods
Leiblum et al. (1998), (53) A longitudinal study Convenient sampling: 75 infertile women were followed after the completion of infertility treatment, Group 1 (n = 41), successful IVF women; Group 2 (n = 16), unsuccessful IVF women who adopted; Group 3 (n = 18), unsuccessful IVF women who remained childless. USA Locke-Wallace Marital Adjustment Test 1. There were no significant differences between the three groups on the standardized measures of marital satisfaction
2. Childless women reported that infertility had exerted a significantly greater negative impact on their marriages than that reported by the other two groups
Markestad et al. (1998), (43) Cross-sectional study Convenient sampling: 20 infertile couples. USA Dyadic Adjustment Scale Length of time infertile couples have been seeking medical attention may not severely affect marital adjustment
Lee et al. (2000), (44) Cross-sectional study Convenient sampling: 59 infertile couples. Tai wan Marital Satisfaction Questionnaire The husbands’ marital satisfaction was higher than that of the wives
Lee et al. (2001), (45) Cross-sectional study Convenient sampling: 138 infertile couples. Tai wan Marital Satisfaction Questionnaire Infertility diagnosis is an important factor in assessing the marital satisfaction between husbands and wives
Verhaak et al. (2001), (55) A longitudinal study Convenient sampling: 207 infertile women. Netherlands Maudsley Marital Questionnaire Marital satisfaction changed in both pregnant and nonpregnant women after the first IVF and ICSI cycle
Peterson et al. (2003), (46) Cross-sectional study Convenient sampling: 525 infertile couples. USA Dyadic Adjustment Scale Both men and women in couples who perceived equal levels of social infertility stress reported higher levels of marital adjustment
Monga et al. (2004), (47) Cross-sectional study Not mentioned, Study group: 18 women being on infertility treatment; Control group: 12 women seeking elective sterilization. USA Locke-Wallace Marital Adjustment Test The Marital Adjustment Test scores for the women of the infertile couples were significantly lower than the scores of the controls
Peterson et al. (2006), (48) Cross-sectional study Convenient sampling: 506 infertile men, 520 infertile women. USA Dyadic Adjustment Scale No significant differences were reported between men and women for marital adjustment, but coping is related to marital adjustment
Reporaki et al. (2007), (56) A longitudinal study Convenient sampling. Study group: 367 couples with singleton IVF/ICSI pregnancies; Control group: 379 couples with spontaneous singleton pregnancies. Finland Dyadic Adjustment Scale Successful ART does not constitute a risk for marital adjustment. The shared stress of infertility may even stabilize marital relationships
Wang et al. (2007), (49) cross-sectional study Convenient sampling. Two groups of infertile women, 100 registered for IVF, and 100 registered for ICSI; A control group of 100 women attending a gynecology clinic, who had no known history of infertility. China ENRICH (Evaluating & Nurturing Relationship Issues, Communication & Happiness) Marital Inventory The stresses associated with infertility and IVF treatment had a negative impact on Chinese women's marital quality
Drosdzol et al. (2009), (50) Cross-sectional study Convenient sampling. Study group: 206 infertile couples; Control group: 190 fertile couples. Poland Index of Marital Satisfaction The risk factors of marital dissatisfaction in infertility include: female sex, age over 30, lower education level, diagnosis of male infertility, and infertility duration of 3-6 years
Smith et al. (2009), (51) Cross-sectional study Convenient sampling: 357 men in infertile couples. USA Marital Impact Scale No significant differences were seen between infertility groups in terms of Marital Impact scores