Table 4.

Relation between WFC at baseline and follow-up ill health among women

Baseline WFC	n	‘Cases’	OR (95%) CI for ill health at follow-up
			Model 0	Model 1	Model 2	Model 3
			Crude	Model 0 + age, education, marital status	M1 + weekly working hours, no. of children living at home	M2 + corresponding health measure at baseline
General self-rated health
Low	1826	249	1	1	1	1
Moderate	1192	269	1.85 (1.53–2.23)	1.96 (1.61–2.38)	2.01 (1.65–2.44)	1.61 (1.30–1.99)
High	367	132	3.56 (2.77–4.58)	3.97 (3.07–5.15)	4.20 (3.23–5.46)	2.63 (1.95–3.54)
Pseudo R2			0.030	0.039	0.042	0.168
Hosmer–Lemeshow test			χ2(1) = 0.00; P = 1.00	χ2(8) = 7.17; P = 0.518	χ2(8) = 6.05; P = 0.642	χ2(8) = 6.27; P = 0.616
Emotional exhaustion
Low	1780	286	1	1	1	1
Moderate	1161	403	2.78 (2.33–3.31)	2.82 (2.36–3.36)	2.886 (2.39–3.42)	1.55 (1.26–1.90)
High	352	208	7.54 (5.89–9.66)	8.08 (6.26–10.42)	8.33 (6.44–10.77)	2.70 (2.01–3.62)
Pseudo R2			0.090	0.100	0.100	0.229
Hosmer–Lemeshow test			Χ2(1) = 0.00; P = 1.00	χ2(8) = 13.09; P = 0.109	χ2(8) = 6.82; P = 0.556	χ2(8) = 17.48; P = 0.026
Problem drinking
Low	1683	70	1	1	1	1
Moderate	1090	56	1.25 (0.87–1.79)	1.18 (0.82–1.70)	1.16 (0.81–1.68)	1.17 (0.81–1.70)
High	337	16	1.15 (0.66–2.00)	1.069 (0.60–1.86)	1.03 (0.58–1.81)	1.12 (0.63–2.00)
Pseudo R2			0.000	0.004	0.004	0.018
Hosmer–Lemeshow test			χ2(1) = 0.00; P = 1.00	χ2(8) = 10.45; P = 0.235	χ2(8) = 8.10; P = 0.423	χ2(8) = 13.68; P = 0.090