Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 28;23(4):617–622. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cks118

Table 1.

Association between low-frequency hearing loss and self-reported early retirement in the HUNT Study

Early retirement (N) Model I Model II Model III Model IV
Yes No OR (95% CI) R2Adj (%) OR (95% CI) R2Adj(%) OR (95% CI) R2Adj (%) OR (95% CI) R2Adj (%)
Men
    Aged 31–45 years 119 4264 1.63 (1.27–2.10) 4.5 1.56 (1.18–2.07) 8.3 1.44 (1.05–1.98) 6.2 1.47 (1.07–2.04) 11.1
    Aged 46–65 years 1262 6497 1.25 (1.14–1.36) 25.1 1.23 (1.11–1.35) 27.0 1.20 (1.08–1.33) 27.0 1.16 (1.05–1.29) 32.1
Women
    Aged 31–45 years 229 4823 1.17 (0.96–1.43) 2.7 1.14 (0.91–1.42) 4.9 1.07 (0.81–1.42) 4.8 1.02 (0.77–1.35) 8.5
    Aged 46–65 years 1698 6848 1.16 (1.07–1.26) 15.7 1.14 (1.05–1.25) 17.1 1.11 (1.01–1.23) 18.4 1.12 (1.00–1.24) 25.1

OR per 10 dB mean bilateral loss.

Model I = adjusted for medium- and high-frequency hearing loss and age per year.

Model II = adjusted for medium- and high-frequency hearing loss, age per year and educational level in HUNT1.

Model III = adjusted for medium- and high-frequency hearing loss, age per year, educational level in HUNT1 and position in labour market in HUNT1.

Model IV = adjusted for medium- and high-frequency hearing loss, age per year, educational level in HUNT1, position in labour market in HUNT1 and general health HUNT1.

R2 Adj = Nagelkerke R2.

Number of participants in analysis is based on model I, N varies from 25 740 (model I) to 19 184 (model IV) owing to missing information.