Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug;57(8):4001–4009. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00796-13

Table 3.

Summary of the efficacy data in the SHIV-RT macaque model testing prototype and modified gelsa

Gel Version No. of applications Gel dosing relative to challenge (h) Protection vs CG gel (%) No. of infected macaques/no. of challenged macaques P value vs CG gel
ZA/CGb Prototype 14 daily 8 78 70 1/7 4/21 0.0089
ZA/CGb Prototype 14 daily 24 53 2/7
ZA/CGb Prototype 14 EOD 24 78 1/7
CGb Prototype 14 daily 8–24 N/A 9/14 N/A
ZA/CG Modified 14 daily 24 53 2/7 0.1354
CG Modified 14 daily 8–24 N/A 3/5 N/A
ZA/CG Poolc 14 daily 24 66 6/28 0.006
CG Poold 14 daily 8–24 N/A 12/19 N/A
a

EOD, every other day; N/A, not applicable.

b

Published data (6).

c

Pool of the results obtained with the prototype and modified ZA/CG gel (application adaily or EOD for 14 days, with SHIV-RT challenge 8 to 24 h after the last gel application).

d

Pool of the results obtained with the prototype and modified CG gel (application daily for 14 days, with SHIV-RT challenge 8to 24 h after the last gel application).