Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jul 23.
Published in final edited form as: Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2008 Jun 28;32(8):1388–1397. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2008.00707.x

Table 6.

Means and Effect Sizes for Selected Variables From Experiment 2 for Non-Exposed Control (CON) and Alcohol-Exposed (ALC) Groups

Variable CON M (SD) ALC M (SD) ESa F p
Confirmed correct verbal 9.41 (2.50) 8.91 (3.72) 0.16 0.23 0.64
Confirmed correct perceptual 10.82 (1.74) 7.04 (3.47) 1.38 16.93 <0.001
Percent accuracy sorting 8.88 (2.42) 6.04 (3.84) 0.88 7.15 0.01
Percent accuracy description 9.06 (2.41) 6.17 (3.74) 0.92 7.72 0.008
Repeated sorts 2.76 (1.75) 4.61 (3.43) 0.68 4.09 0.05
Set loss errors 0.00 (0.00) 0.22 (0.67) 0.46 1.77 0.19
Nontarget even sort 0.53 (0.94) 0.96 (1.11) 0.42 1.65 0.21
Repeated descriptions / free 1.06 (1.56) 3.48 (4.56) 0.71 4.38 0.04
Incorrect description / free 1.76 (1.89) 6.00 (5.28) 1.07 9.93 0.003
Structured description score 9.00 (2.45) 5.22 (3.49) 1.25 14.60 <0.001
Incorrect description / structured 3.18 (3.66) 7.74 (5.11) 1.03 9.80 0.003
Repeated description / structured 1.29 (1.76) 5.00 (4.48) 1.09 10.38 0.003
CST compositeb 97.18 (6.06) 83.39 (14.92) 1.21 12.86 0.001
FSIQ–CST 13.59 (13.24) 1.83 (11.78) 0.94 8.77 0.005

All scores except the FSIQ–CST difference score and error scores are scaled scores with a mean of 10 and a standard deviation of 3. Scaled scores were converted to standard scores to calculate the CST composite. Error scores are presented as raw scores.

a

Effect sizes are Cohen’s d with small effects > 0.2, medium effects > 0.5, and large effects > 0.8.

b

CST composite is an average of the following scores: confirmed correct verbal, confirmed correct perceptual, percent accuracy sorting, percent accuracy description, and recognition description. Before averaging, scores were converted from scaled scores to standard scores to be consistent with FSIQ.