Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 15;10:49. doi: 10.1186/1743-7075-10-49

Table 6.

Performance in the RAVLT after 4 weeks consumption of the active- versus the control diet 1

RAVLT, trials no. 1-10
  Active diet Control diet
1: List 1
12.0 ± 0.73
11.3 ± 0.64
2: List 1
16.8 ± 0.73
15.9 ± 0.80
3: List 1
20.1 ± 0.72
20.0 ± 0.75
4: List 1
21.8 ± 0.71
21.8 ± 0.77
5: List 1 (best learning)
22.7 ± 0.68
22.9 ± 0.74
1-5: List 1 (mean learning 1–5)
18.6 ± 0.65
18.4 ± 0.69
6: List 2 (PI)
9.3 ± 0.62
9.6 ± 0.70
7: List 1 (RI)
21.0 ± 0.80
20.7 ± 0.86
8: 20 min pause. List 1
21.7 ± 0.80
21.7 ± 0.95
9: List 3 (Recognition)
28.0 ± 0.51
27.2 ± 0.69*
10: List 1 (Order of listed nouns) 17.1 ± 0.64 16.0 ± 0.59

1 RAVLT: The Rey Auditory-Verbal Learning test.

*: p < 0.05 for the differences in performance in RAVLT no. 9 after the active diet in comparison to after the control diet. Data are given as means per treatment ± SEM, n = 42. PI proactive interference, RI retroactive interference.