Table 3. Effect of the GC test result on urologists treatment recommendations post radical prostatectomy.

Treatment Recommendation		Adjuvant			Salvage
Pre-GC	Post-GC	Pre-GC	Change N (%)	95% CI	Pre-GC	Change N (%)	95% CI
Overall	Any Change	240	103 (43%)	37-49%	180	95 (53%)	45-60%
Observation	Any Treatment	114	42 (37%)	28-46%	31	19 (61%)	42-78%
	Radiation	114	37 (32%)	24-42%	31	12 (39%)	22-58%
	Hormone therapy	114	4 (4%)	1-9%	31	0 (0%)
	Radiation + Hormone therapy	114	1 (0.9%)	0-5%	31	7 (23%)	10-41%
	Other*	114	1 (1%)	0-5%	31	2 (7%)	0.8-21%
Any Treatment	Observation	125	34 (27%)	19-35%	143	23 (16%)	11-23%
Radiation	Observation	100	31 (31%)	22-41%	82	11 (13%)	7-23%
Hormone therapy	Observation	1	1 (100%)	3-100%	6	1 (17%)	0.4-64%
Radiation + Hormone therapy	Observation	24	2 (8%)	1-27%	55	11 (20%)	10-33%
Other*	Observation	1	1 (100%)	3-100%	6	0 (0%)

^*In the advjuant setting, ‘other’ treatment recommendations included: “recheck path” and “medical oncologist and radiation oncologist consult”

^*In the salvage setting ‘other’ treatment recommendations included: “DRE, imaging” x3, “DRE, imaging, possible referral to radiation oncologist” x2, and “referral to medical oncologist”