Table 4. Change in treatment intensity from initial perceived clinical risk compared against GC risk.
| Timepoint | Perceived Risk | GC Risk | Decrease | No Change | Increase |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adjuvant | high | low | 20 (50%) | 18 (45%) | 2 (5%) |
| high | 3 (5%) | 35 (58.3%) | 22 (36.7%) | ||
| low | low | 15 (18.8%) | 60 (75%) | 5 (6.3%) | |
| high | 3 (5%) | 24 (40%) | 33 (55%) | ||
| Salvage | high | low | 48 (45.7%) | 53 (50.5%) | 4 (3.8%) |
| high | 1 (3.3%) | 17 (56.7%) | 12 (40%) | ||
| low | high | 4 (8.9%) | 15 (33.3%) | 26 (57.8%) |
Low (High) Perceived Risk = < half (> half) of clinicians initially recommend treatment
Low (High) GC Risk at Advjuvant timepoint = 5 year predicted probability < 6% (> 6%)
Low (High) GC Risk at Salvage timepoint = 3 year predicted probability < 18% (> 18%)