Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2013 May 23;19(7):739–750. doi: 10.1017/S1355617713000507

Table 3.

Model comparison for each outcome variable

Variable Model K W Chisq p
Stroop Int 1 17 0.45
Stroop Int 2 18 0.31 1.31 0.2532
Stroop Int 3 19 0.24 1.47 0.2247
Symbol
Digit
1 17 0.16
Symbol
Digit
2 18 0.61 4.72 0.0298
Symbol
Digit
3 19 0.23 0.05 0.8264
Trails A 1 17 0.30
Trails A 2 18 0.43 2.75 0.0971
Trails A 3 19 0.27 1.14 0.2863
Trails B 1 17 0.00
Trails B 2 18 0.02 8.76 0.0031
Trails B 3 19 0.98 10.26 0.0014
Putamen 1 17 0.08
Putamen 2 18 0.11 2.57 0.1088
Putamen 3 19 0.81 6.08 0.0137
Caudate 1 17 0.19
Caudate 2 18 0.09 0.49 0.4826
Caudate 3 19 0.72 6.34 0.0118
Frontal
White
1 17 0.18
Frontal
White
2 18 0.56 4.32 0.0377
Frontal
White
3 19 0.25 0.46 0.4967

Note. K = number of model parameters; W = AIC weight; df = 1 for all chi-squared (Chisq) tests.