Table 4.

Correlations Between Conscientiousness and Guilt Proneness

Conscientiousness	TOSCA	DCQ				M
Conscientiousness	TOSCA	Impersonal	Harm	Trust	Overall	M
CAC overall	.28^*	.27^*	.21^*	.10	.27^*	.23
Reliability	.34^*	.18^*	.31^*	.20^*	.20^*	.25
Orderliness	.11	.08	.08	.17	.17	.12
Impulse control	.24^*	.22^*	.31^*	.37^*	.37^*	.30
Industriousness	.23^*	.13	.16	.15	.15	.16
Conventionality	.15	.25^*	−.01	.14	.14	.13
CCS overall	.39^*	.37^*	.32^*	.18^*	.39^*	.33
Responsibility	.49^*	.23^*	.37^*	.30^*	.34^*	.35
Order	.15	.20^*	.17^*	.04	.19^*	.15
Self-control	.23^*	.37^*	.24^*	.20^*	.36^*	.28
Industriousness	.37^*	.17^*	.21^*	.08	.20^*	.26
Traditionality	.26^*	.40^*	.21^*	.13	.36^*	.27
M	.27	.24	.22	.17	.26

Note. TOSCA = Test of Self-Conscious Affect; DCQ = Dimensions of Conscience Questionnaire; CAC = Conscientiousness Adjective Checklist; CCS = Chernyshenko Conscientiousness Scales. Both measures of guilt proneness are scenario based.

p < .05.