Skip to main content
. 2013 May 28;381(1):69–83. doi: 10.1007/s11010-013-1689-4

Table 1.

Cardiac function in mice at 2 week post-MI with and without MGF E-peptide treatment

Group parameter Control Control + SCR-peptide Control + E-peptide 2 week MI 2 week MI + SCR-peptide 2 week MI + E-peptide
HR 594 ± 20 546 ± 25 526 ± 24 555 ± 17 565 ± 27 530 ± 16
MAP 80 ± 2.5 71 ± 1.9 74 ± 1.3 61 ± 5* 66 ± 4.0* 76 ± 3.6
EDV 46 ± 1.0 47 ± 4.0 50 ± 3.0 66 ± 3.1* 69 ± 3.0* 68 ± 2.4*
ESV 25 ± 0.7 24 ± 0.8 27.5 ± 1.0 53 ± 3.3* 58 ± 2.5* 55 ± 3.5*
V int 22.4 ± 1.4 21.2 ± 0.8 24 ± 1.3 38.9 ± 4* 49 ± 2.7* 39.6 ± 3.5*
ESP 102 ± 2.2 102 ± 8.8 93 ± 2.0 77 ± 3.1* 79 ± 3.0* 92 ± 3.5
EDP 6.8 ± 0.7 7.0 ± 1.0 6.7 ± 0.8 9.7 ± 1.5* 9.7 ± 1.7* 8.2 ± 1.4*
SV 20.8 ± 0.7 22.6 ± 2.7 22.4 ± 1.0 12.2 ± 1.7* 12.9 ± 0.7* 15.1 ± 1.4*
CO 12,138 ± 972 11,879 ± 1,835 11,891 ± 742 6,987 ± 871* 6,850 ± 650* 7,938 ± 933*
SW 1,645 ± 60 1,749 ± 199 1,645 ± 170 645 ± 72* 713 ± 77* 1,236 ± 154*,
dP/dtmax 11,321 ± 560 10,053 ± 346 8,957 ± 337 5,692 ± 311* 6,085 ± 409* 10,357 ± 240
dP/dtmin −10,344 ± 617 −8,704 ± 237 −8,632 ± 235 −5,562 ± 546* −5,988 ± 418* −8,918 ± 285
Tau-G 8.3 ± 0.6 8.7 ± 1.1 7.3 ± 0.3 15.4 ± 3.5* 10.3 ± 0.8* 9.7 ± 0.5*
PAMP 60.6 ± 7.6 55.6 ± 5.3 48 5 ± 6.1 9.6 ± 1.2* 8.6 ± 1.0* 23.0 ± 2.0*
TPR 6.8 ± 0.6 6.3 ± 0.7 6.4 ± 0.5 10.2 ± 1.6* 10.4 ± 1.3* 9.3 ± 1.0*
E a 4.6 ± 0.23 4.6 ± 0.8 4.5 ± 0.5 6.6 ± 0.6* 7.7 ± 0.7* 7.5 ± 0.6*
E a/E s 0.20 ± 0.01 0.23 ± 0.04 0.28 ± 0.04 0.84 ± 0.06* 0.71 ± 0.11* 0.60 ± .0.04*,

Pressure–volume loop measurements collected in the closed chest configuration

HR Heart rate (beats per minute), MAP mean arterial pressure (mmHg), EDV end diastolic volume (μl), ESV end systolic volume (μl), V int volume intercept (μl), ESP end-systolic pressure (mmHg), EDP end-diastolic pressure (mmHg), SV stroke volume (μl), CO cardiac output (μl/min), SW stroke work (mmHg/μl), dP/dt max maximum first derivative of change in systolic pressure with respect to time (mmHg/s), dP/dt min maximum first derivative of change in diastolic pressure with respect to time (mmHg/s), Tau-Glantz-time constant of fall in ventricular pressure by Glantz method (ms), PAMP preload adjusted maximal power (mWatts/ml2), TPR total peripheral resistance (mmHg/ml/min), E a /E s vascular-to-ventricular coupling

* P < 0.05 versus control;  P < 0.05 versus 2 week MI (n = 6 per group)