Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun 15;27(4):272–282. doi: 10.7555/JBR.27.20120067

Table 2. Prevalence and distribution of serological markers of Parvovirus B19 among sickle cell anemia (SCA) patients and controls.

Parvovirus B19 Serological markers ˆ SCA Patients [% (95% CI)]
Non-SCA Control % (95% CI)
Overall population
Steady(N = 48) Unsteady (N = 25) Total (N = 73) RR (95% CI) ˆ (N = 81) OR (95% CI) P-value* (N = 154)
IgM 14.6 (4.6-24.6) 24 (7.3-40.7)b 17.8 (9-26.6) 1.65 (0.62-4.37) 11.1 (4.3-17.9) 1.73 (0.64-4.77) 0.24 14.3 (8.8-19.8)
IgG 68.8 (55.7-81.9) 48 (26.4-67.6)b 61.6 (50.4-72.8) 0.70 (0.45-1.10) 64.2 (53.8-74.6) 0.90 (0.44-1.82) 0.74 62.9 (55.3-70.5)
IgM+IgG 4.2 (1.5-9.9) 12 (0.7-24.7)b 6.8 (1-12.6) 2.70 (0.48-15.1) 0 (0) ND 0.02 3.2 (0.4-6)
Seronegative 12.4 (3.1-21.9) 16 (1.6-30.4)b 13.8 (5.8-21.6) 1.28 (0.40-4.12) 24.7 (17.7-37.1) 0.48 (0.19-1.2) 0.09 19.5 (13.2-25.8)

Data are percentage (95% Confidence interval, CI) of cases with parvovirus B19 serological markers. bP > 0.05 (Steady vs. Unsteady SCA patients); ˆ Relative risk (95% CI) values of steady state SCA patients compared to their unsteady state counterparts. *P-value (chi-square or Fischer exact test) of comparison between the SCA patients (Total) and non-SCA control. ˆ P < 0.05 (SCA vs. non-SCA for total frequency of IgM)-χ2 test. P < 0.05 was considered to be significant.