Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 6;20(4):613–618. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001570

Table 2.

Performance comparison using ANN, SVM, SSL, and SSL Co-training with the 10 datasets

Dataset Accuracy AUC
ANN SVM SSL SSL Co-training ANN SVM SSL SSL Co-training
1 0.66 0.52 0.72 0.77 0.68 0.79 0.77 0.84
2 0.67 0.52 0.72 0.79 0.72 0.79 0.79 0.82
3 0.62 0.50 0.70 0.76 0.68 0.80 0.78 0.78
4 0.67 0.51 0.68 0.75 0.72 0.79 0.76 0.81
5 0.64 0.52 0.71 0.77 0.66 0.82 0.78 0.82
6 0.62 0.52 0.71 0.76 0.68 0.78 0.77 0.83
7 0.63 0.51 0.69 0.77 0.67 0.79 0.77 0.83
8 0.69 0.51 0.73 0.76 0.73 0.82 0.80 0.82
9 0.66 0.52 0.70 0.74 0.71 0.81 0.78 0.78
10 0.64 0.51 0.73 0.77 0.73 0.81 0.80 0.81
Average 0.65 0.51 0.70 0.76 0.70 0.80 0.78 0.81

ANN, artificial neural network; AUC, area under the curve; SSL, semi-supervised learning; SVM, support vector machine.

Bold numbers represent best performance among the four models.