Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Public Health. 2011 Oct 21;57(4):691–698. doi: 10.1007/s00038-011-0314-0

Table 1.

Sample characteristics, adults in rural Chinese households, 2008 (all figures are percentages except when explicitly identified as means; percentages and means are weighted to be representative of adults living in rural Chinese households).


Total sample Subsamples
Non-migrant
households
Migrant households
with no remittances
Migrant households
with remittances
Migrant households 32.1 -- -- --
CES-D score [mean] 12.1 11.3 13.9 13.7
Depression (CES-D>=16) 26.8 24.7 29.9 35.0
Male 54.0 55.9 52.9 47.0
Age (years)
  18–24 5.8 6.5 6.1 0.0
  25–34 21.6 27.3 12.4 1.7
  35–44 32.9 34.7 28.9 29.6
  45–54 23.7 18.4 31.4 43.9
  55–64 16.0 13.1 21.1 24.9
Marital status
  Never married 6.6 8.8 2.7 0.0
  Currently married 90.3 88.5 93.8 95.2
  Divorced, separated, widowed 3.1 2.7 3.6 4.8
Currently working 87.2 82.9 96.0 96.6
Education
  No education 12.0 9.0 19.2 16.0
  Primary school 33.1 30.9 32.8 50.2
  Lower middle school 37.5 38.4 37.4 30.7
  Upper middle school and tertiary 17.4 21.7 10.5 3.0
Monthly individual income (rmb) [mean] 818 923 600 591
Household size [mean] 4.3 3.9 5.2 4.7
Respondent had previously migrated 22.1 17.1 29.6 40.2
Sample size N 709 462 165 82

About a third of migrant households had received remittances in the previous year (82/(82+165)=0.33).