Skip to main content
. 2010 Dec;21(6):316–322. doi: 10.5830/CVJA-2010-005

Table 3. Descriptive Statistics For Girls With High Body Fat Percentage Versus Girls With Normal Body Fat Percentage.

Variable Body fat % > 25% (n = 35) Body fat % > 25% (n = 101)
Mean/number Standard deviation/% Mean/number Standard deviation/%
Age (years) 15.43 1.24 15.55 1.41
Weight (kg)# 43.98 5.88 51.80 8.52
Height (cm) 155.6 0.04 155.0 6.67
BMI (kg/m2)# 18.12 2.11 21.53 3.09
Waist circumference (cm) 60.55 4.24 66.28 5.78
WHR 0.75 0.04 0.76 0.05
Triceps skin fold (mm)# 10.99 3.87 18.11 5.93
Sub-scapular skin fold (mm)# 9.00 2.95 13.99 5.51
Abdominal skin fold (mm)# 12.82 4.15 22.09 7.11
Fat %# 20.60 4.64 32.06 4.74
Muscle mass (kg) 33.57 5.16 34.66 5.28
Tanner stage 1* (14 years) 2 5.7% 0 0
Tanner stage 2* (14.4 ± 0.6, 13–15 years) 5 14.3% 5 4.9%
Tanner stage 3* (15.2 ± 1.2, 14–17 years) 10 28.6% 46 45.5%
Tanner stage 4* (15.7 ± 1.2, 14–18 years) 16 45.7% 43 42.6%
Tanner stage 5* (16.6 ± 1.4, 15–18 years) 2 5.7% 7 6.9%
Median Interquartile range Median Interquartile range
Serum CRP (mg/l) 0.30 0.15–0.91 0.34 0.20–1.23

Differentiated on account of fat percentage, girls with fat percentages > 25% were classified over-fat, according to Lohman.28

*Tanner stage based on breast/genital development stage (1 = no development, 5 = mature)21 with age, mean ± SD (range), #significant differences between groups. BMI: body mass index; CRP: serum C-reactive protein concentration; WC: waist circumference; TSF: triceps skin fold.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure