Skip to main content
. 2010 Dec;21(6):316–322. doi: 10.5830/CVJA-2010-005

Table 4. Descriptive Statistics For Boys With High Body Fat Percentage Versus Boys With Normal Body Fat Percentage.

Variable Body fat % > 20% (n = 70) Body fat % > 20% (n = 15)
Mean/number Standard deviation/% Mean/number Standard deviation/%
Age (years) 15.88 1.56 15.65 1.44
Weight (kg)# 47.96 8.55 53.80 14.46
Height (cm) 161.31 8.66 159.51 10.30
BMI (kg/m2)# 18.32 2.28 20.87 3.69
Waist circumference (cm) 65.11 4.94 69.60 7.12
WHR 0.84 0.06 0.83 0.04
Triceps skin fold (mm)# 7.74 2.60 14.14 6.28
Sub-scapular skin fold (mm)# 7.18 1.82 12.20 8.18
Abdominal skin fold (mm)# 9.50 4.33 21.32 11.01
Fat %# 16.16 4.21 29.62 4.23
Muscle mass (kg) 40.45 7.49 37.99 10.50
Tanner stage 1* (–) 0 0 0 0
Tanner stage 2* (14.9 ± 0.7, 13–15 years) 6 8.6% 1 6.7%
Tanner stage 3* (15.0 ± 1.2, 13–17 years) 14 20% 4 26.6%
Tanner stage 4* (16.0 ± 1.3, 14–18 years) 44 62.8% 9 60%
Tanner stage 5* (16.8 ± 1.0, 15–18 years) 6 8.6% 1 6.7%
Median Interquartile range Median Interquartile range
CRP (mg/l) 0.39 0.15–0.90 0.59 0.20–1.65

Differentiated on account of fat percentage, boys with fat percentages > 20% were classified over- fat, according to Lohman.28

*Tanner stage based on genital development stage (1 = no development, 5 = mature)21 with age, mean ± SD (range), #significant differences between groups. BMI: body mass index; CRP: serum C-reactive protein concentration; WC: waist circumference; TSF: triceps skin fold.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure