Skip to main content
. 2012 Apr;23(3):136–142. doi: 10.5830/CVJA-2011-019

Table 2. Comparison Of Clinical, Electrocardiographic And Echocardiographic Features Of Pure Tic And Dcmo Matched For Age, Gender And LVEF.

Patient demographics and clinical features Pure TIC group (n = 25) n (%) DCMO group (n = 25) n (%) p-value*
Age 46 (16–67) 46 (21–65) 0.846
Gender
Male 19 (76) 19 (76)
Female 6 (24) 6 (24) 1.00
NYHA
NYHA I, II 9 (36) 4 (16)
NYHA III, IV 16 (64) 21 (84) 0.02
Palpitations
Yes 21 (84) 12 (48)
No 4 (16) 13 (52) 0.007
Mann-Whitney test, *Chi-square test, #Student’s t-test.
Signs of heart failure
Yes 12 (48) 21 (84)
No 13 (52) 4 (16) 0.007
ECG features
Sinus rhythm
Yes 5 (20) 19 (76)
No 20 (80) 6 (24) < 0.001
LA enlargement
Yes 3 (12) 8 (32)
No 5 (20) 11 (44) 0.546
Unable to assess 17 (68) 6 (24)
Q waves
Yes 1 (4) 10 (40)
No 24 (96) 15 (60) 0.002
LBBB
Yes 2 (8) 6 (24)
No 23 (92) 19 (76) 0.123
RBBB
Yes 1 (4) 0 (0)
No 24 (96) 25 (100) 0.5
LVH
Yes 4 (16) 14 (56)
No 21 (84) 11 (44) 0.004
Repolarisation abnormalities
Yes 16 (64) 22 (88)
No 9 (36) 3 (12) 0.048
QRS width (ms) 88 (82-102) 100 (92-110) 0.024
RV6 (mm) 15.8 ± 7.5 15.0 ± 11.2 0.79#
RV6/Rmax 1.84 ± 0.8 1.69 ± 1.2 0.63#
Echocardiographic features
LVEF (%) 30.8 ± 9.5 27.8 ± 10.2 0.29#
LVIDd (cm) 5.7 ± 0.7 6.6 ± 0.6 < 0.001#
LVIDs (cm) 4.9 ± 0.8 5.7 ± 0.6 0.001#
LA size (cm) 4.1 ± 1.0 4.6 ± 0.5 0.048#