Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 24;8(7):e69539. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069539

Table 1. Signaling pathways.

WT_Mock ERAP1-KO_Mock WT_Ad5-HIV-gag ERAP1-KO_Ad5-HIV-gag
DAI 1.0±0.1 1.6±0.7 87.2±15.6a 106.4±36.6a
FynT 1.0±0.1 1.0±0.3 0.5±0.1 0.7±0.3
IRF3 1.0±0.3 1.0±0.3 1.0±0.3 1.4±0.5
IRF7 1.0±0.2 1.1±0.1 15.1±2.5a 23.1±7.3ab
IRF8 1.0±0.05 1.0±0.6 3.2±0.9a 4.8±2.2a
Jak1 1.0±0.1 0.8±0.1 1.2±0.2 1.2±0.7
MyD88 1.0±0.2 0.9±0.1 6.3±0.3a 8.5±2.7ab
NFkB 1.0±0.1 0.9±0.1 1.8±0.7 2.3±0.7a
NOD1 1.0±0.2 0.9±0.1 2.7±0.5a 3.1±1.0a
NOD2 1.0±0.03 1.3±0.7 3.8±1.0a 5.6±2.2ab
RIG1 1.0±0.2 1.5±0.3 13.2±4.1a 17.3±5.0a
SLAM 1.1±0.5 1.7±0.8 1.8±0.4 1.5±0.2
SOCS1 1.2±0.8 1.1±0.7 209.6±72.9a 217.7±95.1a
SOCS3 1.0±0.2 0.4±0.1 4.9±1.0a 4.4±1.4a
STAT1 1.0±0.1 1.0±0.2 17.1±4.1a 22.0±8.3a
TBK1 1.0±0.1 0.9±0.3 5.2±0.8a 5.9±2.0a
TLR2 1.0±0.1 1.5±0.4 128.1±50.0a 163.5±63.7ab
TLR3 1.0±0.2 0.8±0.4 27.8±12.4a 37.8±17.9ab
TLR4 1.0±0.2 1.2±0.3 1.4±0.3 1.8±0.6
TLR6 1.0±0.2 1.2±0.4 5.2±1.8a 10.6±3.7ab
TLR9 1.0±0.4 1.8±0.8 8.2±2.7a 6.3±2.5a
TRAF6 1.0±0.2 0.8±0.2 1.0±0.1 1.0±0.6
TRIF 1.0±0.3 1.0±0.3 1.7±0.4a 2.0±0.8a

Ad5-HIV-gag induced gene expression in livers of C57BL/6 mice (fold over WT_Mock, 6 hpi). The numbers represent Mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was completed using One Way ANOVA with a Student-Newman-Keuls post-hoc test, p<0.05 was deemed a statistically significant difference. n = 4 for all Mock injected groups, n = 6 for all Ad5-HIV-gag injected groups.

a

Significant differences as compared to WT_Mock;

b

significant differences in transcriptional activation in ERAP1-KO_Ad5-HIV-gag group as compared to WT_Ad5-HIV-gag group (also indicated by boldface font).