Table 4.
Short platelet RNAs antisense to repeat elements
Repeat family | Span enrichment | Repeat family | Span enrichment | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
sample 1 / Short |
DNA?.DNA? |
2.08 |
sample 2 / Short |
LTR?.LTR? |
2.88 |
|
SINE.SINE |
2.05 |
tRNA.tRNA |
2.38 |
|
|
LINE.Dong-R4 |
1.85 |
DNA?.DNA? |
2.00 |
|
|
SINE?.SINE? |
1.82 |
LINE.Dong-R4 |
1.95 |
|
|
LTR.ERVL? |
1.80 |
snRNA.snRNA |
1.76 |
|
|
tRNA.tRNA |
1.79 |
SINE?.SINE? |
1.75 |
|
|
LINE.RTE-BovB |
1.73 |
Satellite.acro |
1.70 |
|
|
SINE.tRNA |
1.64 |
SINE.SINE |
1.64 |
|
|
rRNA.rRNA |
1.62 |
Unknown.Unknown |
1.63 |
|
|
snRNA.snRNA |
1.62 |
scRNA.scRNA |
1.62 |
|
|
DNA.hAT-Blackjack |
1.60 |
LTR.ERVL? |
1.59 |
|
|
DNA.TcMar-Mariner |
1.60 |
SINE.tRNA |
1.57 |
|
|
|
|
LTR.LTR |
1.55 |
|
|
|
|
DNA.hAT-Blackjack |
1.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sample 3 / Short |
DNA.Merlin |
2.68 |
sample 4 / Short |
LINE.L1? |
2.72 |
Unknown?.Unknown? |
2.35 |
tRNA.tRNA |
2.49 |
||
LTR?.LTR? |
2.14 |
DNA.Merlin |
2.40 |
||
LINE?.Penelope? |
2.02 |
SINE?.SINE? |
2.09 |
||
LINE.Dong-R4 |
1.95 |
LINE.RTE-BovB |
2.02 |
||
tRNA.tRNA |
1.83 |
SINE.tRNA |
1.96 |
||
scRNA.scRNA |
1.78 |
LTR?.LTR? |
1.88 |
||
SINE.SINE |
1.74 |
rRNA.rRNA |
1.87 |
||
LTR.ERVL? |
1.72 |
DNA?.DNA? |
1.79 |
||
SINE.tRNA |
1.69 |
Unknown.Unknown |
1.71 |
||
DNA?.DNA? |
1.66 |
LINE.Dong-R4 |
1.69 |
||
rRNA.rRNA |
1.65 |
SINE.SINE |
1.64 |
||
DNA.PiggyBac? |
1.65 |
Unknown?.Unknown? |
1.56 |
||
snRNA.snRNA |
1.62 |
snRNA.snRNA |
1.55 |
||
SINE.Deu |
1.60 |
DNA.hAT-Blackjack |
1.54 |
||
LTR.LTR |
1.59 |
LTR.LTR |
1.54 |
||
Unknown.Unknown |
1.58 |
|
|
||
DNA.hAT-Blackjack |
1.55 |
|
|
||
LINE.RTE-BovB |
1.54 |
|
|
||
DNA.TcMar-Mariner | 1.52 |
Enrichments values are shown for the four samples and for sequenced short transcripts that are antisense to known categories of repeat elements. Note the prevalence of antisense transcripts to tRNAs, LINEs, SINEs and DNA transposons. All values represent span enrichments. The use of a question mark (“?”) next to a repeat family category is inherited from RepeatMasker’s notation convention and indicates that the corresponding sequences are likely members of the stated repeat family as per RepeatMasker’s analysis.