Table 3. Resolution of the Assertiveness × Likability interaction in the 300–450 ms time window for the anterior ROIs in Experiment 1.
Effect ofAssertiveness | Estimate | 95% CI-lower | 95% CI-upper | p-value | |
Left-anterior | low Likability | 0.42 | 0.03 | 0.79 | <0.06 |
high Likability | −1.04 | −1.72 | −0.36 | <0.04 | |
Right-anterior | low Likability | −0.04 | −0.46 | 0.39 | >0.90 |
high Likability | −1.08 | −1.67 | −0.49 | <0.02 |
Effects of by-participant Assertiveness judgements on mean ERP amplitude differences in the Low-Likability (i.e. lower-than-median likability of the political speaker) and High-Likability (i.e. higher-than-median likability of the political speaker) groups as well as associated confidence intervals and p-values. Note that, since the by-ROI analyses reported here did not involve any random slopes, confidence intervals and p-values could be estimated using MCMC sampling [29].