Table 3.
Correlations between efficiency on the various ANT-R attentional effects and MFT efficiency (MFTE) slope.
| MFTE slope | AE | VE | OE | FE | LE | A×Fe | O×FE | V×FE | F×LE | A×LE | O×LE | V×LE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AE | -.22 | 1 | |||||||||||
| VE | .29 | .01 | 1 | ||||||||||
| OE | .23 | .17 | .49** | 1 | |||||||||
| FE | .24 | .12 | .66** | .64** | 1 | ||||||||
| LE | -.03 | .17 | .01 | .05 | .20 | 1 | |||||||
| A×FE | -.10 | .51** | -.01 | .21 | .18 | 0.21 | 1 | ||||||
| O×FE | .11 | .45** | .32* | .34* | .26 | -0.16 | -.45** | 1 | |||||
| V×FE | .07 | .24 | .54** | .21 | .54** | 0.05 | .32* | 0.11 | 1 | ||||
| F×LE | .04 | -.04 | .26 | .32* | .24 | 0.26 | 0.11 | .34* | 0.27 | 1 | |||
| A×LE | -.22 | .27 | -.14 | .08 | .16 | -0.19 | 0.06 | 0.01 | -0.04 | -0.04 | 1 | ||
| O×LE | -.18 | -.22 | -.09 | -.14 | -.06 | 0.05 | -0.22 | 0.18 | 0.11 | 0.29 | -.36* | 1 | |
| V×LE | -.25 | -.08 | .06 | -.21 | .09 | 0.17 | -0.23 | -0.07 | 0.07 | 0.12 | 0.06 | .41** | 1 |
*
p< 0.05
**
p < 0.01; (2-tailed).
A = Alerting; V = Validity; O = Orienting time; F = Flanker Conflict; L = Location Conflict; A×F = Alerting by Flanker; O×F = Orienting by Flanker; V×F = Validity by Flanker; A×L = Alerting by Location; O×L = Orienting by Location; V×L = Validity by Location.