Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Mucosal Immunol. 2013 Jan 16;6(5):1006–1015. doi: 10.1038/mi.2012.138

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Crosstalk between TCRαβ and TCRγδ T cell. (a and b) Lung cells were isolated at 6 h from vehicle or SEA treated WT (left) or TCRβ−/− mice (right) and stimulated with media alone (top) or PMA/I (bottom). Cells were stained for CD3, Thy1.2, TCRδ, CD69 and IL-17A, and the CD3+Thy1.2+TCRδ+ T cells were analyzed for CD69 expression and IL-17A production. Bar graphs indicate the percentage of CD3+Thy1.2+TCRδ+ T cells positive for IL-17A. Data were combined from 3 independent experiments with n = 4 for vehicle n = 8 for the SEA treated group in both WT and TCRβ−/− mice. Data shown are Mean +/− SEM. Statistical significance between vehicle and SEA was evaluated by two tailed Student’s t tests with all p values <0.05. (c) Following a 4 h stimulation with media or PMA/I, we gated on SEA-induced CD44highIL-17+ cells within the GL3+CD3+TCRβ population and stained for individual γδ TCR usage. The percentage of cells expressing Vγ1, Vγ2, or lacking expression of both, are shown graphically. (d and e) Isolating and identifying γδ T cells as above, we gated on the total population of Vγ1+, Vγ2+, and Vγ4+ cells present in the lung tissue at 6 h to assess the percent IL-17+ by individual subsets of γδ T cells following vehicle versus SEA challenge. Representative dot plots are shown at left with data quantified in the graph at right. Data are representative of 3 independent experiments with n=12 for both vehicle and SEA. Statistical significance between vehicle and SEA was evaluated by two tailed Student’s t tests with all p values <0.05.