Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013 Jul 2;21(9):1891–1899. doi: 10.1002/oby.20432

Table 3.

Liquid feeding trial variables correlated throughout development.

Lickometer Variable Correlation
3 and 6 months a
Correlation
6 and 12 months b
Meal Number r = 0.146, p=0.534 r = 0.211, p=0.226
Meal Length r = 0.338, p=0.054 r = 0.17, p=0.408
Intermeal Interval r = −0.134, p=0.556 r = 0.846, p = 0.000
Meal 1 Length r = 0.102, p=0.527 r = 0.208, p=0.293
Meal 1 Intermeal Interval r = −0.147, p=0.479 r = 0.852, p = 0.000
Lick Count r = 0.585, p=0.001 r = 0.307, p=0.118
Gram/lick r = 0.249, p=0.15 r = 0.442, p=0.016
Gram/meal r = 0.586, p=0.001 r = 0.347, p=0.077
Low fat consumption(g) r = 0.471, p=0.009 r = 0.579, p=0.001
High fat consumption (g) r = 0.281, p=0.237 r = −0.32, p=0.111
Total consumption (g) r = 0.752, p=0.000 r = 0.532, p=0.003
a

In order to evaluate whether feeding parameters remained stable throughout development for an individual lickometer variables measured at 3 months of age were compared to the same variable measured at 6 months of age (i.e.: meal number measured at 3 months was correlated with meal number measured at 6 months). Bold indicates significance at 0.05 α.

b

In order to evaluate whether feeding parameters remained stable throughout development for an individual lickometer variables measured at 6 months of age were compared to the same variable measured at 12 months of age (i.e.: meal number measured at 6 months was correlated with meal number measured at 12 months). Bold indicates significance at 0.05 α.